Regional Consultation and Validation Series · 11 August–15 September 2026

Your contributions and how we responded

Thank you for helping shape the Regional Local Youth Agri-Procurement Strategy. Explore the recommendations recorded across six sessions, the drafting responses they informed and the decisions that remain open.

6consultation sessions

90recommendation entries

18sets of drafting changes

Repeated themes are retained to preserve their session of origin. The 90 entries are not 90 unique recommendations, participant counts or approvals.

Download the source record · Word Download all 90 entries · CSV

What this record establishes

This page reproduces the mapping in the supplied Consultation Traceability and Validation Record, covering the Strategy revision dated 16 September 2026. The consultations considered the earlier Local Agriculture First Policy; applying the findings to the youth-focused Strategy was a subsequent drafting step.

A drafting response is not implementation or formal approval. Historical source statuses remain unchanged. Support in one session does not close a question left open in another. The Session 6 report does not include formal counts and dispositions for five validation propositions, so this record does not certify approval of every revised clause.

Clause numbers refer to that recorded revision, not later drafts. The record retains a historical 30% ambition as unvalidated and indicative. CAYAB’s subsequently proposed 15% youth procurement set-aside is a separate proposal for consultation and is not attributed to approval through this series.

COTED recognition, institutional acceptance, funding and pilot participation are not established by this record.

What changed in the drafting

Each entry below shows the earlier drafting gap, the response recorded and the recommendation IDs supporting it. The revision text is an excerpt; the full provision belongs to the corresponding Strategy version.

C01 1.6 Consultation basis and validation status

Earlier drafting gap

The baseline acknowledges consultation without identifying the six-session record or limits of validation.

Recorded drafting response

This revision incorporates the Regional Consultation and Validation Series held from 11 August to 15 September 2026 and its final consolidated report. The historical consultations considered the proposed Local Agriculture First Policy (LAFP); applying those findings to this Strategy is a subsequent drafting step.

Evidence

S1-R02 S6-R13

Outstanding decision or limit

Draft incorporation is recorded. This does not establish formal approval or implementation.

C02 6.2.1 Demand planning and buyer readiness

Earlier drafting gap

Procurement planning is encouraged, but the information and operational conditions needed by buyers and suppliers are unspecified.

Recorded drafting response

For an agreed activity, buyers and responsible technical partners should document products, quantities, seasonal demand, specifications, food-safety requirements, delivery locations and frequency, acceptable delivered cost, receiving capacity and payment arrangements before suppliers commit production. Buyer forecasts should distinguish indicative demand from authorised orders or contracts.

Evidence

S1-R05 S2-R01 S2-R02 S4-R06 S6-R01

Outstanding decision or limit

Draft incorporation is recorded. This does not establish formal approval or implementation.

C03 6.2.2 Payment and working capital

Earlier drafting gap

Payment is mentioned in activity design but a verifiable payment pathway and financing review are absent.

Recorded drafting response

Before contracting, the authorised buyer should agree the invoice requirements, receipt and acceptance evidence, responsible payment office, payment interval, discrepancy-resolution route and escalation process. Delivery, acceptance, rejection, invoicing and payment dates should be recorded so delays and their causes can be assessed.

Evidence

S2-R06 S5-R18 S6-R01

Outstanding decision or limit

Payment terms, financing options and the demand-to-payment handoff require authorised agreement; the Session 2 referral and Session 5 unresolved status remain open.

C04 6.2.3 Supply shortfalls and procurement targets

Earlier drafting gap

The 30 percent option is retained, but exception controls and target measurement require definition.

Recorded drafting response

Any proposed local-supply exception should identify the affected product, quantity, reason, evidence of supply assessment, authorising body, duration and review date. Records should support aggregated reporting and review of repeated shortfalls.

Evidence

S2-R07 S2-R08 S4-R07

Outstanding decision or limit

Exception procedures and the feasibility and measurement of any target require country review. Later support for transparency does not close the earlier unresolved legal and operational questions.

C05 6.3.1 Accessible registration and distinct decisions

Earlier drafting gap

Supplier registration and certification are listed without a complete separation of engagement, verification and procurement decisions.

Recorded drafting response

Registration should provide visibility, engagement and referral without requiring every entrant already to be certified, formally established or digitally connected. Minimum fields, verification responsibilities and update arrangements should be agreed for the defined purpose.

Evidence

S1-R06 S2-R03 S3-R09 S4-R03 S4-R04 S4-R05 S6-R09

Outstanding decision or limit

Ownership, mandatory fields, eligibility rules and the response to mixed views on exclusion need confirmation.

C06 6.3.2 Compliance and enterprise development

Earlier drafting gap

Training provisions need a market-specific compliance and affordability pathway.

Recorded drafting response

Supplier support should begin with a gap assessment against the selected product and buyer requirements and include food-safety training, verification, market-appropriate certification, traceability, costing, records and production planning. Technical and financial support options should identify compliance costs, who could meet them and the conditions for assistance.

Evidence

S1-R07 S1-R08 S2-R04 S5-R14 S6-R02

Outstanding decision or limit

Compliance costs, financing and incentive design remain for technical review; training does not resolve the Session 2 Mixed View by itself.

C07 6.4.1 Demand and existing assets before investment

Earlier drafting gap

The baseline encourages hubs and storage expansion without explicit investment gates.

Recorded drafting response

Infrastructure preparation should map verified demand, supplier capacity, existing facilities, service gaps and utilisation before recommending new construction. Compare rehabilitation, coordination of existing market houses or cooperative assets, shared services and farm networks with new facilities.

Evidence

S3-R02 S3-R03 S3-R04 S3-R05 S3-R13 S6-R03 S6-R05

Outstanding decision or limit

Investment thresholds, ownership, costs and campus feasibility remain referred or under further technical review; no construction is authorised.

C08 6.5.1 Integrated logistics and climate resilience

Earlier drafting gap

Cold-chain expansion is proposed without specifying operational interfaces, accessibility or continuity requirements.

Recorded drafting response

Aggregation, preparation, packing, storage, transport, delivery and digital records should be designed as connected services. Product-specific plans should identify temperatures, handling requirements, shelf life, collection points, routes, delivery windows, capacity and responsibilities for loss or rejection.

Evidence

S2-R05 S3-R01 S3-R06 S3-R07 S3-R10 S3-R11 S3-R12 S3-R14

Outstanding decision or limit

Logistics models and affordability require technical assessment; the Session 3 Mixed View is retained.

C09 6.6.1 Connected functions and interoperable services

Earlier drafting gap

Digital tools are listed separately without defining the complete delivery chain or limits on a regional layer.

Recorded drafting response

Digital support should connect identity and consent, supplier and product information, eligibility decisions, demand matching, orders, production scheduling, inventory, logistics, delivery confirmation, payment and evidence. Retain suitable national and institutional systems and minimise duplicate collection.

Evidence

S3-R08 S4-R01 S4-R02 S4-R16 S4-R17 S4-R22 S6-R10

Outstanding decision or limit

A regional service layer remains Referred; architecture and institutional responsibilities must be reviewed before technology selection.

C10 6.6.2 Data governance security and redress

Earlier drafting gap

The baseline refers to sensitive information but lacks operational safeguards.

Recorded drafting response

An agreed data-governance plan should identify collection purposes, consent where applicable, accountable institutions, mandatory and optional fields, access permissions, storage, retention, permitted sharing, correction, export and withdrawal arrangements where applicable. Collect only necessary information and protect personal and commercially sensitive records.

Evidence

S1-R09 S4-R04 S4-R09 S4-R11 S4-R12 S4-R13 S4-R15 S6-R10

Outstanding decision or limit

Data ownership, access rules and grievance responsibilities require agreement by the relevant institutions.

C11 6.6.3 Responsible artificial intelligence

Earlier drafting gap

No specific AI decision safeguards are stated.

Recorded drafting response

If AI is proposed for forecasting, matching, planning or early warning, its purpose, input quality, limitations and responsible human decision-maker should be documented. Test for bias and exclusion, provide understandable criteria and allow affected participants to challenge consequential outcomes through human review.

Evidence

S4-R10

Outstanding decision or limit

AI use cases, accountability and appeal rules require technical and institutional review.

C12 7.11.1 Documented handoffs and joint work plans

Earlier drafting gap

The baseline responsibility matrix needs operational handoffs, escalation and resource links.

Recorded drafting response

For each agreed activity, the participating institutions should record a work plan with activities, accepted roles, outputs, costs, resources, indicators and agreed dates. At each handoff—from demand and supplier preparation to inspection, contracting, delivery, acceptance and payment—identify the information received, decision authority, evidence passed onward and escalation route for delay.

Evidence

S5-R01 S5-R02 S5-R03 S5-R04 S5-R05 S5-R06 S5-R07 S5-R08 S5-R18 S6-R07 S6-R08

Outstanding decision or limit

The regional convening role, institution-specific mandates and procurement handoffs remain subject to confirmation; no acceptance is inferred.

C13 7.6.1 Youth influence and institutional continuity

Earlier drafting gap

Youth roles are proposed but evidence of influence and links to governance decisions need definition.

Recorded drafting response

Youth should participate early in agenda setting and design, and remain involved in testing, implementation learning, monitoring and evaluation. Agreed roles may include suppliers, processors, logisticians, researchers, communicators, technologists and service operators.

Evidence

S1-R01 S2-R10 S2-R11 S4-R14 S4-R15 S5-R09 S5-R11 S5-R12 S5-R13 S6-R11

Outstanding decision or limit

The CAYAB role referral and institutional-framework questions remain open to the competent governance process.

C14 8.2.1 Readiness evidence before a pilot

Earlier drafting gap

Readiness assessment needs a documented decision and a wider set of feasibility tests.

Recorded drafting response

A readiness record should assess buyer demand and receiving capacity; supplier volumes, seasonality and compliance; procurement and trade conditions; payment and working capital; existing infrastructure and logistics; land, water, energy and climate risks; digital access and data safeguards; accessible participation; costs, maintenance and institutional responsibilities. Findings should identify what is ready, what requires remediation and what prevents proceeding.

Evidence

S1-R05 S4-R18 S6-R04

Outstanding decision or limit

Detailed country readiness criteria and assessment responsibilities remain for technical review; no pilot country is confirmed.

C15 8.6.1 Appraisal of the proposed readiness and investment facility

Earlier drafting gap

Resource mobilisation does not address the proposed integrated facility or grant safeguards.

Recorded drafting response

A proposed procurement readiness and investment facility may be appraised as one option linking shared infrastructure and services, youth and small-enterprise readiness, and buyer demand planning, receipt and payment capacity. Any design should set transparent eligibility and scoring, conflict-of-interest controls, independent review, milestone-based funding and a documented complaints route.

Evidence

S1-R08 S6-R06

Outstanding decision or limit

Facility governance, funding, safeguards and national financing options require further technical review.

C16 8.7.1 Pilot stages and decision gates

Earlier drafting gap

Phasing is supported but entry criteria and expansion decisions are not explicit.

Recorded drafting response

An agreed pilot should specify willing buyers and suppliers, products, locations, selection criteria, objectives, costs, governance, approved financing, safeguards, baseline measures and an evaluation plan. Stages are: institutional and technical consolidation; national readiness assessment; costed pilot design; controlled testing of the complete demand-to-payment chain; and evaluation with revision, expansion or closure as justified.

Evidence

S1-R03 S1-R04 S2-R09 S3-R15 S4-R19 S4-R20 S4-R21 S5-R16 S5-R17

Outstanding decision or limit

Pilot criteria, country participation, funding, timeframes and evaluation commissioning require acceptance and approvals.

C17 10.2.1 Outcome measures and comparable evidence

Earlier drafting gap

The baseline lists measures but needs operational definitions, baselines and limits on economic claims.

Recorded drafting response

Before a pilot begins, agree indicator definitions, baselines, data sources, responsible custodians, disaggregation and reporting intervals. Separate registered, verified, certified, eligible, contracted and active suppliers.

Evidence

S1-R10 S2-R10 S2-R12 S4-R08 S5-R15 S6-R12

Outstanding decision or limit

Indicator definitions, baseline evidence and thresholds remain to be agreed; the earlier no-determination status and later technical-review requirement are retained.

C18 10.6.1 Recommendation response and revision control

Earlier drafting gap

Continuous improvement lacks a reviewable recommendation-to-clause record and response workflow.

Recorded drafting response

CAYAB proposes to maintain a controlled register with a unique recommendation ID, source session and locator, original validation status, response, affected strategy clause, revision version, outstanding issue, institution approached, accepted responsibility where confirmed and feedback to participants. Inclusion in a draft is recorded as a drafting response, not implementation or formal closure.

Evidence

S1-R02 S5-R10 S6-R13

Outstanding decision or limit

The youth recommendation-response workflow remains unresolved until agreed; producing this matrix does not assign response obligations.

The full recommendation record

Find your session, then open a recommendation to see its original classification, recorded drafting response and outstanding matters. Historical references to “Policy” or “LAFP” are preserved in source recommendations.

Reading the status: “Supported” records the session’s classification, not government adoption. “Mixed View”, “Referred”, “Unresolved” and “Further technical review” retain their recorded limits. “Proposed for LoA Committee consideration” and “No formal determination recorded” do not establish acceptance.

Session 1 · 10 entries

10 Proposed for LoA Committee consideration

S1-R01 Endorse structured youth participation as a design requirement. Ensure the revised CAYAB framework defines recurring mechanisms for national input, regional deliberation, implementation participation and accountability.Proposed for LoA Committee consideration

Source locator: Section 7, recommendation 1

Historical source status: Proposed for LoA Committee consideration

Recorded drafting response and clause

7.6.1 (C13) Drafted: Youth influence and institutional continuity.

Outstanding decision or limit

The CAYAB role referral and institutional-framework questions remain open to the competent governance process. Youth participation is incorporated; full institutional-framework amendments remain outside this procurement revision.

S1-R02 Require a recommendation-to-response process. Record each consultation recommendation, responsible institution, disposition, action and status so participants can see how evidence is used.Proposed for LoA Committee consideration

Source locator: Section 7, recommendation 2

Historical source status: Proposed for LoA Committee consideration

Recorded drafting response and clause

1.6 (C01); 10.6.1 (C18) Drafted: Consultation basis and validation status; Recommendation response and revision control.

Outstanding decision or limit

The youth recommendation-response workflow remains unresolved until agreed; producing this matrix does not assign response obligations.

S1-R03 Develop an LAFP implementation roadmap. Translate the policy into phased activities, institutional responsibilities, resourcing requirements, timelines and measurable results.Proposed for LoA Committee consideration

Source locator: Section 7, recommendation 3

Historical source status: Proposed for LoA Committee consideration

Recorded drafting response and clause

8.7.1 (C16) Drafted: Pilot stages and decision gates.

Outstanding decision or limit

Pilot criteria, country participation, funding, timeframes and evaluation commissioning require acceptance and approvals.

S1-R04 Design a pilot programme. Test institutional procurement and local-supplier participation in selected settings before regional scaling.Proposed for LoA Committee consideration

Source locator: Section 7, recommendation 4

Historical source status: Proposed for LoA Committee consideration

Recorded drafting response and clause

8.7.1 (C16) Drafted: Pilot stages and decision gates.

Outstanding decision or limit

Pilot criteria, country participation, funding, timeframes and evaluation commissioning require acceptance and approvals.

S1-R05 Assess procurement readiness. Map institutional demand, procurement rules, payment terms, food-safety requirements, certification and producer capacity.Proposed for LoA Committee consideration

Source locator: Section 7, recommendation 5

Historical source status: Proposed for LoA Committee consideration

Recorded drafting response and clause

6.2.1 (C02); 8.2.1 (C14) Drafted: Demand planning and buyer readiness; Readiness evidence before a pilot.

Outstanding decision or limit

Detailed country readiness criteria and assessment responsibilities remain for technical review; no pilot country is confirmed.

S1-R06 Develop the supplier-registry concept. Define purpose, minimum data fields, verification, update responsibilities, data protection and links to buyers and aggregation mechanisms.Proposed for LoA Committee consideration

Source locator: Section 7, recommendation 6

Historical source status: Proposed for LoA Committee consideration

Recorded drafting response and clause

6.3.1 (C05) Drafted: Accessible registration and distinct decisions.

Outstanding decision or limit

Ownership, mandatory fields, eligibility rules and the response to mixed views on exclusion need confirmation.

S1-R07 Strengthen collective market access. Support cooperatives, producer groups and aggregation hubs that can consolidate supply and improve quality, logistics and bargaining power.Proposed for LoA Committee consideration

Source locator: Section 7, recommendation 7

Historical source status: Proposed for LoA Committee consideration

Recorded drafting response and clause

6.3.2 (C06) Drafted: Compliance and enterprise development.

Outstanding decision or limit

Compliance costs, financing and incentive design remain for technical review; training does not resolve the Session 2 Mixed View by itself.

S1-R08 Create a youth-sensitive incentive review. Assess whether existing grants, finance, training and investment mechanisms enable youth entry, retention and growth.Proposed for LoA Committee consideration

Source locator: Section 7, recommendation 8

Historical source status: Proposed for LoA Committee consideration

Recorded drafting response and clause

6.3.2 (C06); 8.6.1 (C15) Drafted: Compliance and enterprise development; Appraisal of the proposed readiness and investment facility.

Outstanding decision or limit

Compliance costs, financing and incentive design remain for technical review; training does not resolve the Session 2 Mixed View by itself. Facility governance, funding, safeguards and national financing options require further technical review.

S1-R09 Adopt an inclusion standard for innovation. Ensure technology and digital services are accessible to remote, underserved and lower-capacity producers.Proposed for LoA Committee consideration

Source locator: Section 7, recommendation 9

Historical source status: Proposed for LoA Committee consideration

Recorded drafting response and clause

6.6.2 (C10) Drafted: Data governance security and redress.

Outstanding decision or limit

Data ownership, access rules and grievance responsibilities require agreement by the relevant institutions.

S1-R10 Establish a monitoring, evaluation and learning framework. Track participation quality, recommendation uptake, procurement outcomes, youth benefit, producer performance and policy impact.Proposed for LoA Committee consideration

Source locator: Section 7, recommendation 10

Historical source status: Proposed for LoA Committee consideration

Recorded drafting response and clause

10.2.1 (C17) Drafted: Outcome measures and comparable evidence.

Outstanding decision or limit

Indicator definitions, baseline evidence and thresholds remain to be agreed; the earlier no-determination status and later technical-review requirement are retained.

Session 2 · 12 entries

6 Supported; 2 Mixed View; 2 Referred; 1 Unresolved; 1 No formal determination recorded

S2-R01 Communicate institutional demand early enough to inform production, investment and delivery planning.Supported

Source locator: Section 5, register row 1 (Market information)

Historical source status: Supported

Recorded drafting response and clause

6.2.1 (C02) Drafted: Demand planning and buyer readiness.

Outstanding decision or limit

Draft incorporation recorded; revised wording remains subject to review and does not establish implementation.

S2-R02 Create fair opportunity for qualified Caribbean suppliers while maintaining safety, quality, reliability, competitiveness and value for money.Supported

Source locator: Section 5, register row 2 (Local procurement)

Historical source status: Supported

Recorded drafting response and clause

6.2.1 (C02) Drafted: Demand planning and buyer readiness.

Outstanding decision or limit

Draft incorporation recorded; revised wording remains subject to review and does not establish implementation.

S2-R03 Improve producer visibility without excluding suppliers who are not yet fully formalized, certified or digitally connected.Mixed View

Source locator: Section 5, register row 3 (Supplier registry)

Historical source status: Mixed View

Recorded drafting response and clause

6.3.1 (C05) Drafted: Accessible registration and distinct decisions.

Outstanding decision or limit

Ownership, mandatory fields, eligibility rules and the response to mixed views on exclusion need confirmation.

S2-R04 Maintain appropriate standards while providing realistic, financed pathways to compliance for small and emerging suppliers.Mixed View

Source locator: Section 5, register row 4 (Certification)

Historical source status: Mixed View

Recorded drafting response and clause

6.3.2 (C06) Drafted: Compliance and enterprise development.

Outstanding decision or limit

Compliance costs, financing and incentive design remain for technical review; training does not resolve the Session 2 Mixed View by itself.

S2-R05 Address aggregation, storage, cold chain, transport, processing, digital ordering and scheduling alongside procurement.Supported

Source locator: Section 5, register row 5 (Aggregation and infrastructure)

Historical source status: Supported

Recorded drafting response and clause

6.5.1 (C08) Drafted: Integrated logistics and climate resilience.

Outstanding decision or limit

Logistics models and affordability require technical assessment; the Session 3 Mixed View is retained.

S2-R06 Design payment terms and working-capital support so capable small and youth-led suppliers can participate.Referred

Source locator: Section 5, register row 6 (Payment arrangements)

Historical source status: Referred

Recorded drafting response and clause

6.2.2 (C03) Drafted: Payment and working capital.

Outstanding decision or limit

Payment terms, financing options and the demand-to-payment handoff require authorised agreement; the Session 2 referral and Session 5 unresolved status remain open.

S2-R07 Adapt targets, products, timetables and arrangements to differing legal, production, infrastructure, market and trade conditions.Supported

Source locator: Section 5, register row 7 (Member State adaptation)

Historical source status: Supported

Recorded drafting response and clause

6.2.3 (C04) Drafted: Supply shortfalls and procurement targets.

Outstanding decision or limit

Exception procedures and the feasibility and measurement of any target require country review. Later support for transparency does not close the earlier unresolved legal and operational questions.

S2-R08 Define transparent exceptions where local supply is insufficient without undermining LAFP objectives.Unresolved

Source locator: Section 5, register row 8 (Import exemptions)

Historical source status: Unresolved

Recorded drafting response and clause

6.2.3 (C04) Drafted: Supply shortfalls and procurement targets.

Outstanding decision or limit

Exception procedures and the feasibility and measurement of any target require country review. Later support for transparency does not close the earlier unresolved legal and operational questions.

S2-R09 Test the LAFP through a governed, costed and evaluated pilot before considering wider implementation.Supported

Source locator: Section 5, register row 9 (Phased pilot)

Historical source status: Supported

Recorded drafting response and clause

8.7.1 (C16) Drafted: Pilot stages and decision gates.

Outstanding decision or limit

Pilot criteria, country participation, funding, timeframes and evaluation commissioning require acceptance and approvals.

S2-R10 Measure youth participation in procurement, finance, technology, enterprise development and other value-chain opportunities.Supported

Source locator: Section 5, register row 10 (Youth participation)

Historical source status: Supported

Recorded drafting response and clause

7.6.1 (C13); 10.2.1 (C17) Drafted: Youth influence and institutional continuity; Outcome measures and comparable evidence.

Outstanding decision or limit

The CAYAB role referral and institutional-framework questions remain open to the competent governance process. Indicator definitions, baseline evidence and thresholds remain to be agreed; the earlier no-determination status and later technical-review requirement are retained.

S2-R11 Define a complementary role in youth mobilization, market information, supplier visibility and monitoring.Referred

Source locator: Section 5, register row 11 (CAYAB role)

Historical source status: Referred

Recorded drafting response and clause

7.6.1 (C13) Drafted: Youth influence and institutional continuity.

Outstanding decision or limit

The CAYAB role referral and institutional-framework questions remain open to the competent governance process.

S2-R12 Track suppliers, procurement performance, payment, barriers, youth participation and progress against targets.No formal determination recorded

Source locator: Section 5, register row 12 (Monitoring and evaluation)

Historical source status: No formal determination recorded

Recorded drafting response and clause

10.2.1 (C17) Drafted: Outcome measures and comparable evidence.

Outstanding decision or limit

Indicator definitions, baseline evidence and thresholds remain to be agreed; the earlier no-determination status and later technical-review requirement are retained.

Session 3 · 15 entries

11 Supported; 3 Referred; 1 Mixed View

S3-R01 Treat aggregation, preparation, storage, cold chain, logistics, delivery and digital coordination as interconnected LAFP functions.Supported

Source locator: Section 5, register row 1 (Integrated infrastructure)

Historical source status: Supported

Recorded drafting response and clause

6.5.1 (C08) Drafted: Integrated logistics and climate resilience.

Outstanding decision or limit

Logistics models and affordability require technical assessment; the Session 3 Mixed View is retained.

S3-R02 Map institutional demand before major infrastructure decisions.Supported

Source locator: Section 5, register row 2 (Demand mapping)

Historical source status: Supported

Recorded drafting response and clause

6.4.1 (C07) Drafted: Demand and existing assets before investment.

Outstanding decision or limit

Investment thresholds, ownership, costs and campus feasibility remain referred or under further technical review; no construction is authorised.

S3-R03 Assess opportunities to upgrade, coordinate or repurpose existing assets before new construction.Supported

Source locator: Section 5, register row 3 (Existing assets)

Historical source status: Supported

Recorded drafting response and clause

6.4.1 (C07) Drafted: Demand and existing assets before investment.

Outstanding decision or limit

Investment thresholds, ownership, costs and campus feasibility remain referred or under further technical review; no construction is authorised.

S3-R04 Require evidence of sufficient demand and utilization before new hubs or major facilities are considered.Supported

Source locator: Section 5, register row 4 (Utilization)

Historical source status: Supported

Recorded drafting response and clause

6.4.1 (C07) Drafted: Demand and existing assets before investment.

Outstanding decision or limit

Investment thresholds, ownership, costs and campus feasibility remain referred or under further technical review; no construction is authorised.

S3-R05 Define ownership, operation, maintenance, replacement, monitoring and cost recovery.Referred

Source locator: Section 5, register row 5 (Ownership and operations)

Historical source status: Referred

Recorded drafting response and clause

6.4.1 (C07) Drafted: Demand and existing assets before investment.

Outstanding decision or limit

Investment thresholds, ownership, costs and campus feasibility remain referred or under further technical review; no construction is authorised.

S3-R06 Integrate climate risk, water management, irrigation and resilient design into planning and finance.Supported

Source locator: Section 5, register row 6 (Climate resilience)

Historical source status: Supported

Recorded drafting response and clause

6.5.1 (C08) Drafted: Integrated logistics and climate resilience.

Outstanding decision or limit

Logistics models and affordability require technical assessment; the Session 3 Mixed View is retained.

S3-R07 Coordinate product-specific storage, routes, collection points, delivery windows and service providers.Mixed View

Source locator: Section 5, register row 7 (Logistics and transport)

Historical source status: Mixed View

Recorded drafting response and clause

6.5.1 (C08) Drafted: Integrated logistics and climate resilience.

Outstanding decision or limit

Logistics models and affordability require technical assessment; the Session 3 Mixed View is retained.

S3-R08 Connect buyers, suppliers, inventory, orders, transport, delivery, payment and accountability information.Supported

Source locator: Section 5, register row 8 (Digital coordination)

Historical source status: Supported

Recorded drafting response and clause

6.6.1 (C09) Drafted: Connected functions and interoperable services.

Outstanding decision or limit

A regional service layer remains Referred; architecture and institutional responsibilities must be reviewed before technology selection.

S3-R09 Use a living supplier registry or comparable mechanism without treating it as automatic certification.Referred

Source locator: Section 5, register row 9 (Supplier visibility)

Historical source status: Referred

Recorded drafting response and clause

6.3.1 (C05) Drafted: Accessible registration and distinct decisions.

Outstanding decision or limit

Ownership, mandatory fields, eligibility rules and the response to mixed views on exclusion need confirmation.

S3-R10 Enable qualified youth enterprises to participate across infrastructure and market services.Supported

Source locator: Section 5, register row 10 (Youth-led services)

Historical source status: Supported

Recorded drafting response and clause

6.5.1 (C08) Drafted: Integrated logistics and climate resilience.

Outstanding decision or limit

Logistics models and affordability require technical assessment; the Session 3 Mixed View is retained.

S3-R11 Apply universal-design and accessibility requirements across facilities, transport and digital systems.Supported

Source locator: Section 5, register row 11 (Accessibility)

Historical source status: Supported

Recorded drafting response and clause

6.5.1 (C08) Drafted: Integrated logistics and climate resilience.

Outstanding decision or limit

Logistics models and affordability require technical assessment; the Session 3 Mixed View is retained.

S3-R12 Engage intended users and affected communities before decisions become irreversible.Supported

Source locator: Section 5, register row 12 (Community participation)

Historical source status: Supported

Recorded drafting response and clause

6.5.1 (C08) Drafted: Integrated logistics and climate resilience.

Outstanding decision or limit

Logistics models and affordability require technical assessment; the Session 3 Mixed View is retained.

S3-R13 Establish evidence standards for demand, project preparation, climate risk, environmental requirements and viability.Referred

Source locator: Section 5, register row 13 (Investment readiness)

Historical source status: Referred

Recorded drafting response and clause

6.4.1 (C07) Drafted: Demand and existing assets before investment.

Outstanding decision or limit

Investment thresholds, ownership, costs and campus feasibility remain referred or under further technical review; no construction is authorised.

S3-R14 Strengthen farm-to-hotel, processing, distribution and other commercial market connections.Supported

Source locator: Section 5, register row 14 (Private-sector and tourism linkages)

Historical source status: Supported

Recorded drafting response and clause

6.5.1 (C08) Drafted: Integrated logistics and climate resilience.

Outstanding decision or limit

Logistics models and affordability require technical assessment; the Session 3 Mixed View is retained.

S3-R15 Test the relevant LAFP functions through a governed, costed and evaluated national pilot.Supported

Source locator: Section 5, register row 15 (Bounded pilot)

Historical source status: Supported

Recorded drafting response and clause

8.7.1 (C16) Drafted: Pilot stages and decision gates.

Outstanding decision or limit

Pilot criteria, country participation, funding, timeframes and evaluation commissioning require acceptance and approvals.

Session 4 · 22 entries

21 Supported; 1 Referred

S4-R01 Connect identity and consent, eligibility, supplier information, matching, orders, delivery, payment and evidence.Supported

Source locator: Section 5, register No. 1

Historical source status: Supported

Recorded drafting response and clause

6.6.1 (C09) Drafted: Connected functions and interoperable services.

Outstanding decision or limit

A regional service layer remains Referred; architecture and institutional responsibilities must be reviewed before technology selection.

S4-R02 Connect national and institutional systems through common rules and minimum approved information.Supported

Source locator: Section 5, register No. 2

Historical source status: Supported

Recorded drafting response and clause

6.6.1 (C09) Drafted: Connected functions and interoperable services.

Outstanding decision or limit

A regional service layer remains Referred; architecture and institutional responsibilities must be reviewed before technology selection.

S4-R03 Develop the Living Registry as a governed entry and engagement layer with profiles, skills, interests and consent.Supported

Source locator: Section 5, register No. 3

Historical source status: Supported

Recorded drafting response and clause

6.3.1 (C05) Drafted: Accessible registration and distinct decisions.

Outstanding decision or limit

Ownership, mandatory fields, eligibility rules and the response to mixed views on exclusion need confirmation.

S4-R04 Provide assisted registration, mobile-friendly access and offline or alternative pathways.Supported

Source locator: Section 5, register No. 4

Historical source status: Supported

Recorded drafting response and clause

6.3.1 (C05); 6.6.2 (C10) Drafted: Accessible registration and distinct decisions; Data governance security and redress.

Outstanding decision or limit

Ownership, mandatory fields, eligibility rules and the response to mixed views on exclusion need confirmation. Data ownership, access rules and grievance responsibilities require agreement by the relevant institutions.

S4-R05 Separate registration from certification, procurement approval and supplier eligibility decisions.Supported

Source locator: Section 5, register No. 5

Historical source status: Supported

Recorded drafting response and clause

6.3.1 (C05) Drafted: Accessible registration and distinct decisions.

Outstanding decision or limit

Ownership, mandatory fields, eligibility rules and the response to mixed views on exclusion need confirmation.

S4-R06 Communicate expected quantities, standards, locations and delivery dates early enough for supplier planning.Supported

Source locator: Section 5, register No. 6

Historical source status: Supported

Recorded drafting response and clause

6.2.1 (C02) Drafted: Demand planning and buyer readiness.

Outstanding decision or limit

Draft incorporation recorded; revised wording remains subject to review and does not establish implementation.

S4-R07 Make any local-supply exception transparent, time-bound, product-specific and supported by recorded reasons.Supported

Source locator: Section 5, register No. 7

Historical source status: Supported

Recorded drafting response and clause

6.2.3 (C04) Drafted: Supply shortfalls and procurement targets.

Outstanding decision or limit

Exception procedures and the feasibility and measurement of any target require country review. Later support for transparency does not close the earlier unresolved legal and operational questions.

S4-R08 Measure implementation outcomes rather than registration activity alone.Supported

Source locator: Section 5, register No. 8

Historical source status: Supported

Recorded drafting response and clause

10.2.1 (C17) Drafted: Outcome measures and comparable evidence.

Outstanding decision or limit

Indicator definitions, baseline evidence and thresholds remain to be agreed; the earlier no-determination status and later technical-review requirement are retained.

S4-R09 Use aggregated public reporting and protect personal and commercially sensitive information.Supported

Source locator: Section 5, register No. 9

Historical source status: Supported

Recorded drafting response and clause

6.6.2 (C10) Drafted: Data governance security and redress.

Outstanding decision or limit

Data ownership, access rules and grievance responsibilities require agreement by the relevant institutions.

S4-R10 Use AI responsibly with understandable criteria, human review, bias testing and challenge mechanisms.Supported

Source locator: Section 5, register No. 10

Historical source status: Supported

Recorded drafting response and clause

6.6.3 (C11) Drafted: Responsible artificial intelligence.

Outstanding decision or limit

AI use cases, accountability and appeal rules require technical and institutional review.

S4-R11 Define consent, data responsibility, permitted use, access, storage, sharing, correction, export and withdrawal rules.Supported

Source locator: Section 5, register No. 11

Historical source status: Supported

Recorded drafting response and clause

6.6.2 (C10) Drafted: Data governance security and redress.

Outstanding decision or limit

Data ownership, access rules and grievance responsibilities require agreement by the relevant institutions.

S4-R12 Build in role-based access, encryption, access logs, tested backups and incident response.Supported

Source locator: Section 5, register No. 12

Historical source status: Supported

Recorded drafting response and clause

6.6.2 (C10) Drafted: Data governance security and redress.

Outstanding decision or limit

Data ownership, access rules and grievance responsibilities require agreement by the relevant institutions.

S4-R13 Provide visible grievance and appeal mechanisms for decisions affecting opportunities.Supported

Source locator: Section 5, register No. 13

Historical source status: Supported

Recorded drafting response and clause

6.6.2 (C10) Drafted: Data governance security and redress.

Outstanding decision or limit

Data ownership, access rules and grievance responsibilities require agreement by the relevant institutions.

S4-R14 Include youth in design, governance, testing and evaluation.Supported

Source locator: Section 5, register No. 14

Historical source status: Supported

Recorded drafting response and clause

7.6.1 (C13) Drafted: Youth influence and institutional continuity.

Outstanding decision or limit

The CAYAB role referral and institutional-framework questions remain open to the competent governance process.

S4-R15 Account for differences in location, digital literacy, disability, gender and connectivity.Supported

Source locator: Section 5, register No. 15

Historical source status: Supported

Recorded drafting response and clause

6.6.2 (C10); 7.6.1 (C13) Drafted: Data governance security and redress; Youth influence and institutional continuity.

Outstanding decision or limit

Data ownership, access rules and grievance responsibilities require agreement by the relevant institutions. The CAYAB role referral and institutional-framework questions remain open to the competent governance process.

S4-R16 Connect with existing agricultural systems and institutions to reduce duplication.Supported

Source locator: Section 5, register No. 16

Historical source status: Supported

Recorded drafting response and clause

6.6.1 (C09) Drafted: Connected functions and interoperable services.

Outstanding decision or limit

A regional service layer remains Referred; architecture and institutional responsibilities must be reviewed before technology selection.

S4-R17 Further explore an interoperable regional service layer connecting approved services.Referred

Source locator: Section 5, register No. 17

Historical source status: Referred

Recorded drafting response and clause

6.6.1 (C09) Drafted: Connected functions and interoperable services.

Outstanding decision or limit

A regional service layer remains Referred; architecture and institutional responsibilities must be reviewed before technology selection.

S4-R18 Assess demand, suppliers, infrastructure, service gaps, legal conditions and responsibilities before piloting.Supported

Source locator: Section 5, register No. 18

Historical source status: Supported

Recorded drafting response and clause

8.2.1 (C14) Drafted: Readiness evidence before a pilot.

Outstanding decision or limit

Detailed country readiness criteria and assessment responsibilities remain for technical review; no pilot country is confirmed.

S4-R19 Establish governance, security, financing, safeguards and evaluation arrangements before a pilot.Supported

Source locator: Section 5, register No. 19

Historical source status: Supported

Recorded drafting response and clause

8.7.1 (C16) Drafted: Pilot stages and decision gates.

Outstanding decision or limit

Pilot criteria, country participation, funding, timeframes and evaluation commissioning require acceptance and approvals.

S4-R20 Define pilot selection criteria, objectives, risks, limitations and success measures.Supported

Source locator: Section 5, register No. 20

Historical source status: Supported

Recorded drafting response and clause

8.7.1 (C16) Drafted: Pilot stages and decision gates.

Outstanding decision or limit

Pilot criteria, country participation, funding, timeframes and evaluation commissioning require acceptance and approvals.

S4-R21 Consider independent evaluation before wider regional application.Supported

Source locator: Section 5, register No. 21

Historical source status: Supported

Recorded drafting response and clause

8.7.1 (C16) Drafted: Pilot stages and decision gates.

Outstanding decision or limit

Pilot criteria, country participation, funding, timeframes and evaluation commissioning require acceptance and approvals.

S4-R22 Agree public purpose, accessibility, data rules, service standards, ownership, governance, financing and exit arrangements before technology selection.Supported

Source locator: Section 5, register No. 22

Historical source status: Supported

Recorded drafting response and clause

6.6.1 (C09) Drafted: Connected functions and interoperable services.

Outstanding decision or limit

A regional service layer remains Referred; architecture and institutional responsibilities must be reviewed before technology selection.

Session 5 · 18 entries

15 Supported; 2 Unresolved; 1 Referred

S5-R01 Nationally led implementation with defined regional support.Supported

Source locator: Section 4, register No. 1

Historical source status: Supported

Recorded drafting response and clause

7.11.1 (C12) Drafted: Documented handoffs and joint work plans.

Outstanding decision or limit

The regional convening role, institution-specific mandates and procurement handoffs remain subject to confirmation; no acceptance is inferred.

S5-R02 Formal implementation and accountability framework.Supported

Source locator: Section 4, register No. 2

Historical source status: Supported

Recorded drafting response and clause

7.11.1 (C12) Drafted: Documented handoffs and joint work plans.

Outstanding decision or limit

The regional convening role, institution-specific mandates and procurement handoffs remain subject to confirmation; no acceptance is inferred.

S5-R03 Use suitable existing institutions, mandates and reporting systems.Supported

Source locator: Section 4, register No. 3

Historical source status: Supported

Recorded drafting response and clause

7.11.1 (C12) Drafted: Documented handoffs and joint work plans.

Outstanding decision or limit

The regional convening role, institution-specific mandates and procurement handoffs remain subject to confirmation; no acceptance is inferred.

S5-R04 Readiness assessments, focal points and documented handoffs.Supported

Source locator: Section 4, register No. 4

Historical source status: Supported

Recorded drafting response and clause

7.11.1 (C12) Drafted: Documented handoffs and joint work plans.

Outstanding decision or limit

The regional convening role, institution-specific mandates and procurement handoffs remain subject to confirmation; no acceptance is inferred.

S5-R05 Explicit handoffs across direction, coordination, delivery, technical support and accountability.Supported

Source locator: Section 4, register No. 5

Historical source status: Supported

Recorded drafting response and clause

7.11.1 (C12) Drafted: Documented handoffs and joint work plans.

Outstanding decision or limit

The regional convening role, institution-specific mandates and procurement handoffs remain subject to confirmation; no acceptance is inferred.

S5-R06 Joint work plan with activities, responsibilities, resources, timelines and indicators.Supported

Source locator: Section 4, register No. 6

Historical source status: Supported

Recorded drafting response and clause

7.11.1 (C12) Drafted: Documented handoffs and joint work plans.

Outstanding decision or limit

The regional convening role, institution-specific mandates and procurement handoffs remain subject to confirmation; no acceptance is inferred.

S5-R07 Decision and escalation arrangements for delivery delays.Supported

Source locator: Section 4, register No. 7

Historical source status: Supported

Recorded drafting response and clause

7.11.1 (C12) Drafted: Documented handoffs and joint work plans.

Outstanding decision or limit

The regional convening role, institution-specific mandates and procurement handoffs remain subject to confirmation; no acceptance is inferred.

S5-R08 Partner roles within approved mandates and agreed work programmes.Supported

Source locator: Section 4, register No. 8

Historical source status: Supported

Recorded drafting response and clause

7.11.1 (C12) Drafted: Documented handoffs and joint work plans.

Outstanding decision or limit

The regional convening role, institution-specific mandates and procurement handoffs remain subject to confirmation; no acceptance is inferred.

S5-R09 Documented youth roles across consultation, delivery, learning, monitoring and feedback.Supported

Source locator: Section 4, register No. 9

Historical source status: Supported

Recorded drafting response and clause

7.6.1 (C13) Drafted: Youth influence and institutional continuity.

Outstanding decision or limit

The CAYAB role referral and institutional-framework questions remain open to the competent governance process.

S5-R10 Mechanism to track, answer and report youth recommendations.Unresolved

Source locator: Section 4, register No. 10

Historical source status: Unresolved

Recorded drafting response and clause

10.6.1 (C18) Drafted: Recommendation response and revision control.

Outstanding decision or limit

The youth recommendation-response workflow remains unresolved until agreed; producing this matrix does not assign response obligations.

S5-R11 Early youth participation in policy and programme decisions.Supported

Source locator: Section 4, register No. 11

Historical source status: Supported

Recorded drafting response and clause

7.6.1 (C13) Drafted: Youth influence and institutional continuity.

Outstanding decision or limit

The CAYAB role referral and institutional-framework questions remain open to the competent governance process.

S5-R12 Fair access to practical youth roles with consent and safeguarding.Supported

Source locator: Section 4, register No. 12

Historical source status: Supported

Recorded drafting response and clause

7.6.1 (C13) Drafted: Youth influence and institutional continuity.

Outstanding decision or limit

The CAYAB role referral and institutional-framework questions remain open to the competent governance process.

S5-R13 Include women, rural and underserved youth and those outside formal networks.Supported

Source locator: Section 4, register No. 13

Historical source status: Supported

Recorded drafting response and clause

7.6.1 (C13) Drafted: Youth influence and institutional continuity.

Outstanding decision or limit

The CAYAB role referral and institutional-framework questions remain open to the competent governance process.

S5-R14 Support agricultural registration, validation and record keeping.Supported

Source locator: Section 4, register No. 14

Historical source status: Supported

Recorded drafting response and clause

6.3.2 (C06) Drafted: Compliance and enterprise development.

Outstanding decision or limit

Compliance costs, financing and incentive design remain for technical review; training does not resolve the Session 2 Mixed View by itself.

S5-R15 Measure outcomes beyond activities.Supported

Source locator: Section 4, register No. 15

Historical source status: Supported

Recorded drafting response and clause

10.2.1 (C17) Drafted: Outcome measures and comparable evidence.

Outstanding decision or limit

Indicator definitions, baseline evidence and thresholds remain to be agreed; the earlier no-determination status and later technical-review requirement are retained.

S5-R16 Phased preparation, piloting, review and possible expansion.Supported

Source locator: Section 4, register No. 16

Historical source status: Supported

Recorded drafting response and clause

8.7.1 (C16) Drafted: Pilot stages and decision gates.

Outstanding decision or limit

Pilot criteria, country participation, funding, timeframes and evaluation commissioning require acceptance and approvals.

S5-R17 Identify willing pilot countries following appropriate approval.Referred

Source locator: Section 4, register No. 17

Historical source status: Referred

Recorded drafting response and clause

8.7.1 (C16) Drafted: Pilot stages and decision gates.

Outstanding decision or limit

Pilot criteria, country participation, funding, timeframes and evaluation commissioning require acceptance and approvals.

S5-R18 Connect demand forecasting, supplier preparation, contracting and payment.Unresolved

Source locator: Section 4, register No. 18

Historical source status: Unresolved

Recorded drafting response and clause

6.2.2 (C03); 7.11.1 (C12) Drafted: Payment and working capital; Documented handoffs and joint work plans.

Outstanding decision or limit

Payment terms, financing options and the demand-to-payment handoff require authorised agreement; the Session 2 referral and Session 5 unresolved status remain open. The regional convening role, institution-specific mandates and procurement handoffs remain subject to confirmation; no acceptance is inferred.

Session 6 · 13 entries

7 Supported in discussion; 5 Further technical review; 1 Referred

S6-R01 Use institutional demand and payment arrangements to inform production planning.Supported in discussion

Source locator: Section 5, register No. 1

Historical source status: Supported in discussion

Recorded drafting response and clause

6.2.1 (C02); 6.2.2 (C03) Drafted: Demand planning and buyer readiness; Payment and working capital.

Outstanding decision or limit

Payment terms, financing options and the demand-to-payment handoff require authorised agreement; the Session 2 referral and Session 5 unresolved status remain open.

S6-R02 Provide food-safety training, verification and market-appropriate certification in supplier development.Supported in discussion

Source locator: Section 5, register No. 2

Historical source status: Supported in discussion

Recorded drafting response and clause

6.3.2 (C06) Drafted: Compliance and enterprise development.

Outstanding decision or limit

Compliance costs, financing and incentive design remain for technical review; training does not resolve the Session 2 Mixed View by itself.

S6-R03 Assess existing assets, utilisation and operating requirements before infrastructure investment.Further technical review

Source locator: Section 5, register No. 3

Historical source status: Further technical review

Recorded drafting response and clause

6.4.1 (C07) Drafted: Demand and existing assets before investment.

Outstanding decision or limit

Investment thresholds, ownership, costs and campus feasibility remain referred or under further technical review; no construction is authorised.

S6-R04 Undertake country readiness assessment before major pilot investment.Further technical review

Source locator: Section 5, register No. 4

Historical source status: Further technical review

Recorded drafting response and clause

8.2.1 (C14) Drafted: Readiness evidence before a pilot.

Outstanding decision or limit

Detailed country readiness criteria and assessment responsibilities remain for technical review; no pilot country is confirmed.

S6-R05 Assess the youth incubation campus against country needs rather than impose a fixed model.Further technical review

Source locator: Section 5, register No. 5

Historical source status: Further technical review

Recorded drafting response and clause

6.4.1 (C07) Drafted: Demand and existing assets before investment.

Outstanding decision or limit

Investment thresholds, ownership, costs and campus feasibility remain referred or under further technical review; no construction is authorised.

S6-R06 Further design and appraise the integrated procurement readiness and investment facility and its safeguards.Further technical review

Source locator: Section 5, register No. 6

Historical source status: Further technical review

Recorded drafting response and clause

8.6.1 (C15) Drafted: Appraisal of the proposed readiness and investment facility.

Outstanding decision or limit

Facility governance, funding, safeguards and national financing options require further technical review.

S6-R07 Clearly assign national responsibility for supplier readiness, certification, payment, data and complaints.Supported in discussion

Source locator: Section 5, register No. 7

Historical source status: Supported in discussion

Recorded drafting response and clause

7.11.1 (C12) Drafted: Documented handoffs and joint work plans.

Outstanding decision or limit

The regional convening role, institution-specific mandates and procurement handoffs remain subject to confirmation; no acceptance is inferred.

S6-R08 Keep regional technical contributions subject to institutional mandates and formal arrangements.Referred

Source locator: Section 5, register No. 8

Historical source status: Referred

Recorded drafting response and clause

7.11.1 (C12) Drafted: Documented handoffs and joint work plans.

Outstanding decision or limit

The regional convening role, institution-specific mandates and procurement handoffs remain subject to confirmation; no acceptance is inferred.

S6-R09 Distinguish Living Registry participation from certification, procurement eligibility and funding.Supported in discussion

Source locator: Section 5, register No. 9

Historical source status: Supported in discussion

Recorded drafting response and clause

6.3.1 (C05) Drafted: Accessible registration and distinct decisions.

Outstanding decision or limit

Ownership, mandatory fields, eligibility rules and the response to mixed views on exclusion need confirmation.

S6-R10 Support national digital systems with low-bandwidth access, correction and review mechanisms.Supported in discussion

Source locator: Section 5, register No. 10

Historical source status: Supported in discussion

Recorded drafting response and clause

6.6.1 (C09); 6.6.2 (C10) Drafted: Connected functions and interoperable services; Data governance security and redress.

Outstanding decision or limit

A regional service layer remains Referred; architecture and institutional responsibilities must be reviewed before technology selection. Data ownership, access rules and grievance responsibilities require agreement by the relevant institutions.

S6-R11 Include youth in the design and evaluation of implementation arrangements.Supported in discussion

Source locator: Section 5, register No. 11

Historical source status: Supported in discussion

Recorded drafting response and clause

7.6.1 (C13) Drafted: Youth influence and institutional continuity.

Outstanding decision or limit

The CAYAB role referral and institutional-framework questions remain open to the competent governance process.

S6-R12 Agree pilot indicators and a baseline before implementation.Further technical review

Source locator: Section 5, register No. 12

Historical source status: Further technical review

Recorded drafting response and clause

10.2.1 (C17) Drafted: Outcome measures and comparable evidence.

Outstanding decision or limit

Indicator definitions, baseline evidence and thresholds remain to be agreed; the earlier no-determination status and later technical-review requirement are retained.

S6-R13 Maintain a traceable recommendation register through subsequent revisions.Supported in discussion

Source locator: Section 5, register No. 13

Historical source status: Supported in discussion

Recorded drafting response and clause

1.6 (C01); 10.6.1 (C18) Drafted: Consultation basis and validation status; Recommendation response and revision control.

Outstanding decision or limit

The youth recommendation-response workflow remains unresolved until agreed; producing this matrix does not assign response obligations.

Help us keep the evidence accurate

If your contribution is missing, misrepresented or incorrectly classified, email info@caricomyab.org. Include the session and recommendation ID where available, the correction requested and supporting evidence. Please distinguish corrections to the consultation record from new proposals.

Please avoid sending personal or commercially sensitive information that is unnecessary to explain the correction. This public record organizes contributions by session and recommendation ID rather than publishing participant contact lists.

Next steps

The proposed route is LoA Committee review of the record and drafting responses, technical and institutional consideration of open matters, confirmation of corrections and any additional validation evidence, and finalisation of the COTED submission through the authorised process. No review outcome is pre-filled.

CAYAB seeks recognition of its institutional strengthening and acknowledgement of its development of the Strategy. This update does not announce approval of the Strategy or mandatory national implementation.